Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 02307
Original file (BC 2013 02307.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

IN THE MATTER OF:	DOCKET NUMBER:  BC-2013-02307
		        COUNSEL:  NONE
	 	        HEARING DESIRED:  NO

________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

His records be corrected to reflect the following awards and 
decorations:

1.  Air Medal (AM). 

2.  Presidential Unit Citation (PUC).  

3.  Air Force Overseas Long Tour Ribbon.  

4.  Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal (AFEM).  

________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

He flew over 100 combat missions in Vietnam.

From 1963 to 1969, he was assigned to Tachikawa, Japan, and 
continued to perform combat missions until Jun 1970.  

In support of his requests, the applicant provides a copy of his 
NA Form 13059, Transmittal of and/or Entitlement to Awards.  

The applicant's complete submission, with attachment, is at 
Exhibit A.

________________________________________________________________

STATEMENT OF FACTS:

On 17 Jul 1959, the applicant entered active duty.

His records show he was assigned at Tachikawa, Japan, from     
14 Apr 1964 to 8 Jan 1966.

On 1 Jun 1969, he was released from active duty.

The applicant served a combined period of 9 years, 10 months and 
15 days on active duty.

The AM may be awarded to any person who while serving in any 
capacity with the United States Armed Forces, subsequent to     
8 Sep 1939, distinguishes himself or herself by meritorious 
achievement while participating in aerial flight.  Additionally, 
it may be conferred for sustained meritorious achievement 
(distinction) in the performance of duties involving aerial 
flight.    
 
The Presidential Unit Citation (PUC) is awarded to units of the 
United States Armed Forces for outstanding performance in action 
against an armed enemy occurring on or after, 16 Oct 1941 for 
the US Navy, and on or after 7 Dec 1941 for the US Army and US 
Air Force units.

The Air Force Long Tour Ribbon was authorized by the Chief of 
Staff, U.S. Air Force, on 12 Oct 1980.  Before 6 Jan 1986, the 
ribbon was awarded to Air Force and Air Force Reserve members 
credited with completion of an overseas tour on or after 1 Sep 
1980.  Air Force and Air Force Reserve members serving as of     
6 Jan 1986 or later are entitled to reflect all Air Force 
overseas tours credited during their career.  A service member 
may wear both ribbons, if appropriate.  The short tour ribbon 
takes precedence over the long tour ribbon when both are worn.
 
The AFEM may be awarded to members of the U.S. Armed Forces who 
after 1 Jul 1958:  Participate, or have participated, as members 
of the U.S. military in a U.S. military operation in which 
service members of any military department participate, in the 
opinion of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, in significant numbers, 
and encounter, incident to such participation, foreign armed 
opposition, or are otherwise placed, or have been placed, in 
such position that, in the opinion of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, 
hostile action by foreign armed forces was imminent even though 
it did not materialize.  Service members must have been 
permanently assigned, attached, or detailed to a unit that 
participated in or engaged in direct support of the operation 
for 30 consecutive days in a designated area of eligibility in a 
foreign territory (or the full period when an operation is less 
than 30 days duration) or for 60 non-consecutive days provided 
the support involved entering the area of eligibility.  

________________________________________________________________

AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

AFPC/DPSID recommends denial of the applicant’s request for the 
AM, PUC, Air Force Overseas Ribbon and the AFEM.  

They were unable to locate any official documentation in the 
applicant’s record to verify he was recommended for or awarded 
the AM.  The applicant did not provide a citation, 
recommendation or narrative for the AM or any documentation to 
substantiate an error or injustice occurred. 
   
DPSID was unable to verify the applicant served with a unit that 
received the PUC while the applicant was assigned to the unit; 
therefore, rendering him ineligible for the award.  

The applicant served overseas before the Air Force Overseas 
Ribbon was authorized rendering him ineligible for the award.  
Furthermore, the applicant was not on active duty as of 6 Jan 
1989; therefore, he does not qualify for retroactive award of 
the Air Force Overseas Ribbon.  

There was no documentation available in the applicant’s military 
personnel record verifying the applicant served in the area of 
eligibility and in direct support of an operation for which the 
AFEM is authorized rendering him ineligible for the award.

Based on a review of the applicant’s military personnel records, 
DPSID determined the applicant should have been awarded the Air 
Force Outstanding Unit Award with three Bronze Oak Leaf Clusters 
(AFOUA w/3 BOLC) and the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross 
with Palm (RVNGC w/P).  Upon final determination by the Board, 
DPSID will administratively correct his corrects to include 
these awards.   

The complete DPSID evaluation is at Exhibit C.  

SAF/MRBP recommends denial of the applicant’s requests.

For award of the AM, a copy of the applicant’s records and 
flight logs with annotation, “AM (20 Jul 67)/DAF,” are required 
to corroborate the applicant was awarded the AM.  Absent this 
documentation, MRBP recommends denial of the AM.  

There is no documentation to support the applicant’s unit of 
assignment, with inclusive dates, was awarded the PUC.  
Therefore, MRBP recommends denial of award of the PUC.  

For award of the AFEM, a copy of certified orders or 
documentation showing assignment to a unit that participated in 
or engaged in direct support of an operation for 30 consecutive 
days in a designated area of eligibility, or for the full period 
when an operation was less than 30 days duration, or for 60 non-
consecutive days provided the support involved entering the area 
of eligibility.   Absent this documentation, MRBP recommends 
denial of award of the AFEM.    

As stated in the DPSID advisory, the applicant is not eligible 
for the Air Force Overseas Ribbon since it was established for 
those members credited with completion of an overseas tour on or 
after 1 Sep 1980.  Since the applicant served before this time 
period, he is not eligible for award of the Air Force Overseas 
Ribbon. 


The complete MRBP evaluation is at Exhibit D.  
 
________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

On 19 Mar 2014, the copies of the Air Force evaluations were 
forwarded to the applicant for review and comment within       
30 days.  As of this date, no response has been received by this 
office (Exhibit E).   

________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.  The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by 
existing law or regulations.

2.  The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the 
interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file.      

3.  Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to 
demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice.  We took 
notice of the applicant’s complete submission in judging the 
merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinions and 
recommendations of the Air Force offices of primary 
responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis 
for our conclusion that the applicant has not been the victim of 
an error or injustice.  Therefore, other than the administrative 
corrections awarding the AFOUA w/3 BOLC and the RVNGC w/P, we 
find no basis to recommend granting the relief sought in this 
application.  

________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:

The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not 
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that 
the application was denied without a personal appearance; and 
that the application will only be reconsidered upon the 
submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered 
with this application.

________________________________________________________________

The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket 
Number BC-2013-02307 in Executive Session on 24 Apr 2014, under 
the provisions of AFI 36-2603:
     
 	  , Chair
	  , Member
	  , Member

The following documentary evidence in AFBCMR Docket Number BC-
2013-02307 was considered:

     Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 6 May 2013, w/atch.
     Exhibit B.  Applicant’s Master Personnel Records.
     Exhibit C.  Letter, AFPC/DPSID, dated 16 Sep 2013.  
     Exhibit D.  Letter, SAF/MRBP, undated.  
     Exhibit E.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 19 Mar 2014. 




								 
     					 Chair
 


 

 

Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 02610

    Original file (BC 2013 02610.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    _______________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSID recommends denial of the applicant’s requests for the VSM, RVGC w/P, PUC, VCM, KSM, NATO Medal, Cold War Medal, AFOR-L and AFOR-S. DPSID was unable to locate any documentation in the applicant’s records verifying he served in Vietnam or an area of eligibility for award of the VSM, RVGC w/P or VCM. In regards to the list of medals and unit awards, he was seeking help in finding out whether any...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03737

    Original file (BC 2013 03737.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The AFGCM is awarded to Air Force enlisted personnel during a three-year period of active military service or for a one-year period of service during a time of war. Service members who earned the medal during the first qualifying period and who again became entitled to the medal wear a bronze star on the ribbon to denote the second award of the medal. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice to warrant award of the VSM, VCM,...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 01991

    Original file (BC 2013 01991.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    NPRC records do not show he was awarded the Aerial Gunner Badge or the Aircrew Member Badge. However, he was awarded both since he completed training and served in a unit that completed combat missions. The complete DPSID evaluation is at Exhibit C. USAF/A3O-AIF recommends approval of the request for the Aircrew Member Badge.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04566

    Original file (BC 2013 04566 .txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    He be entitled to the Air Force Outstanding Unit Award with Valor (AFOUA w/V). AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSID recommends denial of the applicant’s requests for entitlement to the VSM, RVNGC w/P, Air Force Overseas Ribbon - Long Tour, AFOUA w/V and the PUC. Upon the final Board decision, administrative correction of the applicant's official military personnel record will be completed by AFPC/DPSOY.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-03890

    Original file (BC-2012-03890.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-03890 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His record be corrected to reflect he was awarded the following: a. Vietnam Service Medal (VSM). ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He served in Guam with the 3960th Strategic Wing for 176...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05446

    Original file (BC 2013 05446.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-05446 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His records be corrected to reflect award of the Air Force Overseas Ribbon, National Defense Service Medal (NDSM), Air Force Training Ribbon (AFTR), United Nations Service Ribbon, Small Arms Expert Marksmanship Ribbon (SAEMR), Cold War Medal, and the Cuban Missile Crisis Medal. The remaining relevant facts...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04235

    Original file (BC-2012-04235.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-04235 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be awarded the Vietnam Service Medal (VSM) for his service in Vietnam. _________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: The Vietnam Service Medal (VSM), created on 8 Jul 65, is awarded to all service members of...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC 2008 04397

    Original file (BC 2008 04397.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    By virtue of an DD Form 149, Application for Correction of Military Record, dated 30 Aug 13, the applicant is requesting award of the RVCM, CRM, VSM, Air Force Overseas Ribbon-Long Tour, Combat Service Commemorative and the Republic of Vietnam Service Commemorative. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice regarding the applicant’s request for award of the Combat Readiness Medal (CRM), Vietnam Service Medal (VSM), Air Force...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 01995

    Original file (BC 2013 01995.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Armed Forces Service Medal. The American Defense Service Medal (ADSM) is awarded to qualifying service members who served on active duty at any time between 8 Sep 39 and 7 Dec 41. We note this application includes a request for two commemorative medals; however, that portion of the applicant’s request was not directly addressed by the Board because commemorative medals are not official decorations issued by the United States Air Force or Department of Defense.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00454

    Original file (BC 2014 00454.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant contends his request through his Congressman in 2001 resulted in being awarded the DFC w/1 BOLC; however, a letter from the NPRC to his Congressman, on behalf of the applicant, states they verified entitlement to the requested medals and awards on the DA Form 1577, Authorization for Issuance of Awards, which includes a basic award of the DFC but no annotation of a DFC w/1 BOLC. The applicant was awarded the Air Medal (AM) w/ 9 OLCs by an Eighth Air Force Special Order (G-353)...